Відео

More unscientific nonsense

Their isn't one answer for it. Personal opinion everything in space changes in every which way infinite shapes and forms. So light really cant get exactly measured for to many warps in space

"it's not the same as the spinning of a ball" And then drops the ball and runs away. If ever a statement required an immediate explanation, that was it.

These AI generated vocals are annoying

I want to tell a question to you if you are that much intelligent in theory of relativity. "If you can enter a black hole then you search the singularity ,all of the people say that the singularity is an plank meter sized hole ,but if you managed to get near the singularity would you become smaller than the singularity or the singularity becomes bigger" .Do you have any answer of this question.

All water on earth equals the moon

This is AI

2:50 What causes the high tide on the opposite side (left) of the Earth? It seems the moon's gravity should attract all the water to the moon causing a high tide only on a right side.

Here's a wild idea: What if light does have mass, but our technology/knowledge isn't good enough yet to detect it. Just like we thought atoms were the smallest things in the universe. Crazy idea that WE might be wrong, I know!

The most important thing about Gravity is that Gravity SUCKS.

Of course the Earth has mass !! IMG

Bro you are next big thing on UA-cam for sure just keep doing your work it is mind-blowing 👍👍👍

Relativity theory not goes Einstein for nobel

WHAT E=MC2 FUNDAMENTALLY means is that gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia. INDEED, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. This CLEARLY proves what is the fourth dimension, AND this CLEARLY solves what is the coronal heating “problem”. I have proven why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution, AS I have proven why WHAT IS THE MOON will (and does) move away very, very, very slightly in relation to WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground !!!! By Frank Martin DiMeglio Gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia, as WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. This is CLEARLY consistent with the FOURTH dimension AND conservation of energy, AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. (INDEED, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM are linked AND BALANCED opposites.) Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. What is E=MC2 is consistent with TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE; AS c squared CLEARLY does represent a dimension of SPACE (ON BALANCE); AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Great. MOREOVER, WHAT IS THE MOON will (and does) move away very, very, very slightly IN RELATION TO what is THE EARTH/ground. Great. I have FUNDAMENTALLY and truly explained the cosmological redshift AND WHAT IS THE FOURTH dimension. (Consider WHAT IS complete combustion AND WHAT IS E=MC2.) GREAT. Again, gravity/acceleration involves what is balanced inertia; AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS I have FUNDAMENTALLY and truly explained the motion of what is THE MOON; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Great !!!! Again, consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Perfect. Think. Again, I have CLEARLY proven WHAT IS the FOURTH dimension ON BALANCE. “Mass”/ENERGY is CLEARLY electromagnetic/gravitational ON/IN BALANCE. GREAT !!!! By Frank Martin DiMeglio

Universe is at least 4-dimension length, width, height, breadth.

🔶🔶🔶>>>FALSE!!!!!!!!!!!! LIES!!!!!!!!!!<<<🔶🔶🔶 Light in an accelerating rocket/system doesn't bend. Each emitted light photon/particle is traveling in a straight path but because the 'floor' of the rocket is moving toward the particle the sequence of these particles looks like a curve. Same is true for constant velocity, non-accelerating, systems BUT physicists use accelerating system examples to cover this up. Why? Because it disproves Onerock's theories and Sir Eddington's conclusion in the 'Sun light bending' experiment. Why then did Eddington observe light curvature? Eddington's light deflection observation was only due to diffraction through the solar limb outside of which no bending occurred! The light bending was caused by atmospheric diffraction just as any light transition tween material with different material densities. You'll never get light bending from objects without an atmosphere [such as the Moon or Mercury]. >>>Relativity fails!<<< . See details in video 'Edward Dowdye Jr The Failed Attempts to Detect Macro Lensing E U Conference 2012' . 🔶🔶🔶>>>Black holes don't exist...by the fundamentals of their own physics, but they skip over such principles. <<<🔶🔶🔶

Black holes don't exist...by their own physics.

На Руки Вверх похоже.

Nope, yall wrong Gravity = stupidity Because we've zero idea what it is... Einstein is gonna be proven a ... donkey

No. That supposition arises only from the point of view. First, the ball doesn't accelerate toward the floor in the lift. The floor in the lift accelerates toward the ball causing it to appear to take a curved path to the floor. The same effect is observed with a light beam viewed from an angle. It appears to bend only because we are either accelerating in some direction with respect to the source of that light beam

This is the first time this concept makes sense to me. Thanks for making this simple and clear.

because gravity distorts the shape of spacetime.

Bending of time due to gravity is myth, not reality because if bending then why not collapsed due to bending or curvature of time. Gravity is dependent on motion also of objects as no one absolute rest in universe. Gravity is cumulative weak nuclear force extra to strong nuclear force or centripetal force extra to strong nuclear force or EMW. IT is all about a new dimension of interaction of strong and weak nuclear force. Now check, by CERN if nucleus alone or proton, neutron alone has gravity?? Similar electron?? If not then check EM field interaction at ultra cool ultra high temp. Similary presence of molten iron at core hints about gravity arise from magnetic field ? My question is if gravity is separate entity then why nature produce magnetic field at every celestial body. Is any link between gravity and magnetic field. But gravity of non ferromagnetic object comes from ? Is gravity of interatomic or molecular cumulative force. All is to check single atom , proton neutron for gravitational force. It is by CERN colloider. +923049906349. Muhammad Furqan from Pakistan.

Gravity curves spacetime. Light has to follow spacetime, thus light is lensed by warped spacetime, not gravity.

Einstein was so smart.

You keep mentioning gravity as a force. GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE ...check out how an accelerometer works, it'll get you sorted

How does life exist and not God?

In this video they use examples.of PERCEPTION of light or movement.of an object in space.as seen by different observers AS IF THAT has the same meaning of time . When cesium clocks set simultaneously on the moon, inside Concord and Boeing airplanes and on Washington base... did gravity (force or geometry of space? You tell me) altered TIME or the cesium clocks measuring "time"?

What did I do to get lucky enough to learn about this stuff in my lifetime? Life is magical ❤

Mean everything will be usual as how you are in your own time. It will be get notified when you back to your own time

Because of mass of planet there is curve in space Because of curve in space, planet has there own gravity Because of gravity there is bending of light Because of bending of light there is time dilation Because speed is equal to distance divided by time..

Space is affected by gravity. Light just takes a straight path through curved space.

8:33 i'm no scientist. But how i imagine 4th dimension, gravity and time are linked together. All objects want to travel trough the time, but if you have the mass you interact with the time. More mass, more time "particles", "gel" is interfered by making objects going trough the time harder journey, slowing down the time near it. As it stretch the time gel it makes it less dense near it, but can not make ripple in gel itself. As other objects also want to travel trough the time they also want to stay in the lowest dense time gel possible, so they will fall into less dense area. We observe that as gravity. Furthermore as gel have to get denser somewhere it might also be at the very "ring" of the atoms creating that objects. So each atom would have dense spacetime ring preventing other atoms from colliding unless enough energy (that also interact with time) is present in particle/atom to break trough this barier. Just my imagination i'm simple IT guy and have almost no knowledge about physics.

I don't understand this concept no matter what how many time I watch, my question is this: As you said, my friend stayed in earth and I went to space for my friend in earth it'll be 24 hours a day cos one day and night is the rotation of earth and that's how he experience 24 hours and for me since I'm in space there is no such concept for me but the clock running is going on... and my biological body and my friends biological body are same we two will experience same appetite, hunger, and other activities as usual to our bodies no matter where we are, then how come I in space will only passed 6 months with less aging than my friend in earth who would have loved for 14 years How come the same biological body will act differently with the ability of anti-aging cells? This is the confusing question I always get in my mind whenever I come across to this concept, but unfortunately I didn't asked to anyone Can any one please explain about this? That'll help me alot.

With gravity affecting light, would light take longer to travel from a large body in space to a smaller body in space than it would for the opposite?

Klonusk deserves more subs.

I think most physicists would agree, we don't live in a manifold either

This video explains it in laymans terms therefore being easy to understand. Thank you Klonusk.

I’m about two minutes in and I figured it out. It’s not gravity. It’s curvature and space but I still don’t understand a damn thing about relativity. Still love your videos though.

NASA said a Woman Employee CREATED the GPS, the General Positioning System, which means Einstein did not

Time slows down - No Tools slow down - Yes

Błędne założenia co do ruchu w pociągu, zegara świetlnego i całej tej teorii, a zatem cała ta teoria idzie na śmietnik. Całe szczęście, że to tylko teoria i nikt jej nigdy nie sprawdzi.

I think we might have just found some kind of longevity cure this is a beautiful presentation thank you. It looks like we're going to have to put things in motion.

I think Einstein had met angel who revealed this knowledge to him, or downloaded. No shot anyone can have a “thought theory that is so accurate”

Simple. Because light follows the shape of the space-time continuum, which is determined by gravitational fields created by objects of great mass such as stars and black holes.

newton was not the first one to know about gravity. it was already mentioned in the ancient indian texts

Velocity is more of a thing here on Planet Earth than in Astronomy, because it's very much useful to us .

How did you edit this video? I need help

Because light is moving through the warped space.

Cool stuff!! I love Science!!